CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration based on the judge's report. The judge found the applicant lacked credibility due to significant inconsistencies in his testimony regarding the injury mechanism and his employer's response. Furthermore, the judge determined the applicant was not employed on the date of the alleged injury, a critical prerequisite for a workers' compensation claim. The Board adopted the judge's findings and incorporated the report's reasoning into its decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration based on the judge's report. The judge found the applicant lacked credibility due to significant inconsistencies in his testimony regarding the injury mechanism and his employer's response. Furthermore, the judge determined the applicant was not employed on the date of the alleged injury, a critical prerequisite for a workers' compensation claim. The Board adopted the judge's findings and incorporated the report's reasoning into its decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.