Home/Case Law/JOSE VELEZ vs. PROGRESSIVE PRODUCE, ZURICH
Regular DecisionReconsideration and Removal

JOSE VELEZ vs. PROGRESSIVE PRODUCE, ZURICH

Filed: Sep 08, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6870715

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB vacated its prior order granting reconsideration and dismissed the lien claimant's petition because the appealed WCJ order was not a final, appealable decision. However, the Board granted removal due to the WCJ's procedural error in striking a medical report via an unauthorized "walk-through" order, which violated due process and WCAB rules. The case is returned to the trial level for proper proceedings on the defendant's discovery motion regarding the physician's deposition. The WCJ can then address issues like deposition fees and potential sanctions if the physician fails to comply.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB vacated its prior order granting reconsideration and dismissed the lien claimant's petition because the appealed WCJ order was not a final, appealable decision. However, the Board granted removal due to the WCJ's procedural error in striking a medical report via an unauthorized "walk-through" order, which violated due process and WCAB rules. The case is returned to the trial level for proper proceedings on the defendant's discovery motion regarding the physician's deposition. The WCJ can then address issues like deposition fees and potential sanctions if the physician fails to comply.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOSE VELEZ vs. PROGRESSIVE PRODUCE, ZURICH (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox