Home/Case Law/JOSE TINOCO vs. FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD
Regular DecisionRemoval

JOSE TINOCO vs. FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD

Filed: Oct 18, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6990605

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) considered Jose Tinoco's Petition for Removal. Based on the administrative law judge's report, which the WCAB adopted, the Petition for Removal was denied. This means the case will proceed as determined by the administrative law judge. The order denying removal was filed and served on October 18, 2010.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) considered Jose Tinoco's Petition for Removal. Based on the administrative law judge's report, which the WCAB adopted, the Petition for Removal was denied. This means the case will proceed as determined by the administrative law judge. The order denying removal was filed and served on October 18, 2010.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOSE TINOCO vs. FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox