Home/Case Law/JOSE OCOTOXTLE vs. MCDONALD'S; Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JOSE OCOTOXTLE vs. MCDONALD'S; Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Sep 01, 2015
Riverside
ADJ7095851

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Jose Ocotoxle's petition for reconsideration. The dismissal was based on the petition seeking reconsideration of a non-final, interlocutory order. Such orders, which do not determine substantive rights, liabilities, or threshold issues, are not appealable. Therefore, the Board found the petition procedurally improper and dismissed it.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Jose Ocotoxle's petition for reconsideration. The dismissal was based on the petition seeking reconsideration of a non-final, interlocutory order. Such orders, which do not determine substantive rights, liabilities, or threshold issues, are not appealable. Therefore, the Board found the petition procedurally improper and dismissed it.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOSE OCOTOXTLE vs. MCDONALD'S; Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS (2015) – Riverside | CompFox