CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an order that had mandated a new Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) panel due to a perceived ex parte communication. The Board found the communication was not ex parte as the applicant was unrepresented and acknowledged receipt, thus rescinding the original order. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, allowing the WCJ to issue a new decision considering all arguments. This decision clarifies that petitions challenging QME determinations are subject to reconsideration, not removal.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an order that had mandated a new Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) panel due to a perceived ex parte communication. The Board found the communication was not ex parte as the applicant was unrepresented and acknowledged receipt, thus rescinding the original order. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, allowing the WCJ to issue a new decision considering all arguments. This decision clarifies that petitions challenging QME determinations are subject to reconsideration, not removal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.