Home/Case Law/ JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Filed: Apr 15, 2014
Oakland
ADJ8497463

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted petitions for reconsideration filed by the defendants in the case of Jose Ledesma. This action was taken due to statutory time constraints and the need for further study of the factual and legal issues. The WCAB requires additional time to fully understand the record and issue a just decision after reconsideration. All future filings in this matter must be submitted in writing directly to the WCAB Commissioners' office, not to district offices or via e-filing.

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted petitions for reconsideration filed by the defendants in the case of Jose Ledesma. This action was taken due to statutory time constraints and the need for further study of the factual and legal issues. The WCAB requires additional time to fully understand the record and issue a just decision after reconsideration. All future filings in this matter must be submitted in writing directly to the WCAB Commissioners' office, not to district offices or via e-filing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND workers compensation case in Oakland. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND case law summary from Oakland. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND Case Analysis

JOSE LEDESMA vs. JOHN HESSELBERG, uninsured, BARBARA HEINZER, JAMES HEINZER, RANDALL HEINZER, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oakland. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.