Home/Case Law/JOSE ALFREDO SOLORZA vs. STERLING MACHINERY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, THE HARTFORD
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JOSE ALFREDO SOLORZA vs. STERLING MACHINERY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, THE HARTFORD

Filed: Apr 15, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ11136283

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order striking the QME panel. The Board found the WCJ's order lacked an evidentiary basis, as no evidence was admitted into the record to support the premature finding. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to establish a proper evidentiary record. The merits of the QME panel dispute were not decided at this stage.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order striking the QME panel. The Board found the WCJ's order lacked an evidentiary basis, as no evidence was admitted into the record to support the premature finding. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to establish a proper evidentiary record. The merits of the QME panel dispute were not decided at this stage.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOSE ALFREDO SOLORZA vs. STERLING MACHINERY, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, THE HARTFORD (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox