CompFox AI Summary
Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Crum & Forster's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of 100% permanent disability for Jose Aldana's 2006 industrial injury. The Board granted SCIF's petition to correct a clerical error, amending the award to designate Crum & Forster as the solely liable insurer. Crum & Forster's arguments regarding the vocational expert's report and potential disability overlap with a prior 2004 eye injury were rejected. The Board affirmed that Aldana is entitled to the full 100% permanent disability award as the claimed overlap disability was not established.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Crum & Forster's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of 100% permanent disability for Jose Aldana's 2006 industrial injury. The Board granted SCIF's petition to correct a clerical error, amending the award to designate Crum & Forster as the solely liable insurer. Crum & Forster's arguments regarding the vocational expert's report and potential disability overlap with a prior 2004 eye injury were rejected. The Board affirmed that Aldana is entitled to the full 100% permanent disability award as the claimed overlap disability was not established.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.