CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding applicant's psychiatric injury compensable. The injury, sustained within six months of employment, qualified as sudden and extraordinary under Labor Code Section 3208.3(d). This was based on applicant's credible testimony that a soil compactor recoiled and fell on him, an event he had never experienced or heard of before. The Board deferred to the Workers' Compensation Judge's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to reject it.
JOSE A. GUZMAN vs. CARMEL VALLEY CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Salinas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Salinas.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding applicant's psychiatric injury compensable. The injury, sustained within six months of employment, qualified as sudden and extraordinary under Labor Code Section 3208.3(d). This was based on applicant's credible testimony that a soil compactor recoiled and fell on him, an event he had never experienced or heard of before. The Board deferred to the Workers' Compensation Judge's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to reject it.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.