CompFox AI Summary
This order dismisses the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from an interlocutory, non-final order that did not determine substantive rights or liabilities. The Board further denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal is not granted. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and extended deference to their credibility findings. Both applicant and defense counsel were admonished for violating WCAB Rule 10842(b) regarding proper referencing of evidence.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This order dismisses the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from an interlocutory, non-final order that did not determine substantive rights or liabilities. The Board further denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal is not granted. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning and extended deference to their credibility findings. Both applicant and defense counsel were admonished for violating WCAB Rule 10842(b) regarding proper referencing of evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.