CompFox AI Summary
Defendant sought reconsideration of a finding that it unreasonably delayed medical treatment to the applicant. The Appeals Board denied the petition, concluding that the issues raised were interlocutory and did not warrant removal. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding of unreasonable delay, citing the applicant's unrefuted testimony. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the cost of medical treatment and applicable penalties.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant sought reconsideration of a finding that it unreasonably delayed medical treatment to the applicant. The Appeals Board denied the petition, concluding that the issues raised were interlocutory and did not warrant removal. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding of unreasonable delay, citing the applicant's unrefuted testimony. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the cost of medical treatment and applicable penalties.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.