Home/Case Law/JOHNNIE MANDONADO vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JOHNNIE MANDONADO vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Feb 15, 2019
TI11981166

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the previous decision to allow further proceedings. The WCAB found that the trial judge erred by excluding applicant's Exhibit No. 1 without allowing the opportunity to provide required declarations. The WCAB also found the agreed vocational expert's report could not be definitively deemed insubstantial evidence and ordered development of the record regarding its admissibility. Finally, the testimony of defense counsel as a witness at trial was stricken due to ethical concerns and lack of necessity.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the previous decision to allow further proceedings. The WCAB found that the trial judge erred by excluding applicant's Exhibit No. 1 without allowing the opportunity to provide required declarations. The WCAB also found the agreed vocational expert's report could not be definitively deemed insubstantial evidence and ordered development of the record regarding its admissibility. Finally, the testimony of defense counsel as a witness at trial was stricken due to ethical concerns and lack of necessity.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOHNNIE MANDONADO vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. (2019) – | CompFox