CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the original findings of fact. The defendant sought reconsideration arguing no substantial medical evidence supported the finding of injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE) and that the findings failed to specify the injured body part. The Board affirmed the AOE/COE finding, adopting the WCJ's credible testimony and contemporaneous medical records supporting a back injury on February 26, 2014. The amended finding specified the injury was to applicant's back.
JOHN VEGA vs. SODEXO, INC., by INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, administered by GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the original findings of fact. The defendant sought reconsideration arguing no substantial medical evidence supported the finding of injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE) and that the findings failed to specify the injured body part. The Board affirmed the AOE/COE finding, adopting the WCJ's credible testimony and contemporaneous medical records supporting a back injury on February 26, 2014. The amended finding specified the injury was to applicant's back.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.