CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a petition for removal, partially quashing a subpoena duces tecum issued to Reed Elsivier. The Board found that the applicant failed to provide proper notice to non-party employees whose employment records were sought, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1985.6, and that some categories were overbroad or irrelevant. The subpoena was affirmed for categories relevant to the applicant's claim and potentially containing disability-related information, but quashed for those violating privacy rights or being overly broad.
JOHN MAGINNIS vs. REED ELSIVIER, CRAWFORD & COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a petition for removal, partially quashing a subpoena duces tecum issued to Reed Elsivier. The Board found that the applicant failed to provide proper notice to non-party employees whose employment records were sought, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1985.6, and that some categories were overbroad or irrelevant. The subpoena was affirmed for categories relevant to the applicant's claim and potentially containing disability-related information, but quashed for those violating privacy rights or being overly broad.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.