CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant permanently and totally disabled. The defendant challenged the vocational expert's opinion, arguing it was based on an inconsistent Residual Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) by the Agreed Medical Examiner. The Board rescinded the award, finding the FCE results were a rough estimate and ordered a new, accurate FCE to clarify the applicant's permanent disability.
JOHN INMAN vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant permanently and totally disabled. The defendant challenged the vocational expert's opinion, arguing it was based on an inconsistent Residual Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) by the Agreed Medical Examiner. The Board rescinded the award, finding the FCE results were a "rough estimate" and ordered a new, accurate FCE to clarify the applicant's permanent disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.