CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that surgery was probably required based on the Agreed Medical Evaluator's deposition testimony. The Board found that the defendant waived any objection to the applicant's evidence by failing to offer potentially contradictory reports in rebuttal at trial. Furthermore, the Board noted that it is not bound by common law evidence rules and hearsay is admissible.
JOHN ALLEN PERRY vs. THE KROGER CO. DBA FOOD 4 LESS, PSI, ADMINISTERED BY SEDGWICK CMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that surgery was "probably" required based on the Agreed Medical Evaluator's deposition testimony. The Board found that the defendant waived any objection to the applicant's evidence by failing to offer potentially contradictory reports in rebuttal at trial. Furthermore, the Board noted that it is not bound by common law evidence rules and hearsay is admissible.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.