CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's finding that the applicant was injured in the course and scope of employment. Defendant argued the finding lacked substantial evidence due to conflicting testimony about the applicant's work activities. The Board rescinded the decision, returning the case for clarification on whether the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of employment (AOE/COE) and which body parts were injured. The Board upheld the WCJ's credibility determination regarding the applicant's testimony about the assault.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's finding that the applicant was injured in the course and scope of employment. Defendant argued the finding lacked substantial evidence due to conflicting testimony about the applicant's work activities. The Board rescinded the decision, returning the case for clarification on whether the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of employment (AOE/COE) and which body parts were injured. The Board upheld the WCJ's credibility determination regarding the applicant's testimony about the assault.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.