CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to review the permanent disability rating of 54% awarded to applicant Joaquin Cortez. The defendant argued the rating was improperly calculated under Ogilvie II, which dictates the burden of proof lies with the party rebutting the scheduled rating. The WCAB found the vocational expert's analysis flawed due to contradictory assumptions about the applicant's pre- and post-injury earning capacity. Consequently, the WCAB reversed the 54% award, finding the applicant failed to rebut the scheduled 13% permanent disability rating and issued an award for 13% disability.
JOAQUIN CORTEZ vs. FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION CORPORTION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to review the permanent disability rating of 54% awarded to applicant Joaquin Cortez. The defendant argued the rating was improperly calculated under Ogilvie II, which dictates the burden of proof lies with the party rebutting the scheduled rating. The WCAB found the vocational expert's analysis flawed due to contradictory assumptions about the applicant's pre- and post-injury earning capacity. Consequently, the WCAB reversed the 54% award, finding the applicant failed to rebut the scheduled 13% permanent disability rating and issued an award for 13% disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.