Home/Case Law/JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Feb 10, 2020
San Francisco
ADJ526691 (LBO 0329338)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted United Airlines' Petition for Reconsideration to amend a finding of fact. The amendment corrects the permanent disability award to exclude an incorrect calculation based on the State Average Weekly Wage increase, as the applicant's injury occurred before the relevant statutory change. The Board otherwise affirmed the original award, deeming the applicant entitled to a 100% permanent disability award at the established weekly rate.

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted United Airlines' Petition for Reconsideration to amend a finding of fact. The amendment corrects the permanent disability award to exclude an incorrect calculation based on the State Average Weekly Wage increase, as the applicant's injury occurred before the relevant statutory change. The Board otherwise affirmed the original award, deeming the applicant entitled to a 100% permanent disability award at the established weekly rate.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. Case Analysis

JITKA VAN DYNE-PARMET vs. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.