Home/Case Law/JISTINA DORSEY vs. ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICE, UNITED WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION, BROADSPIRE VAN NUYS, Trans Pacific Insurance Company, CIGA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JISTINA DORSEY vs. ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICE, UNITED WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION, BROADSPIRE VAN NUYS, Trans Pacific Insurance Company, CIGA

Filed: Dec 31, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ2184889

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration due to a lack of valid proof of service and a discrepancy in the verification date. Even if these procedural defects were overlooked, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits, adopting the WCJ's reasoning. The underlying issues involved a special employee finding, joint and several liability, and the dismissal of CIGA.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration due to a lack of valid proof of service and a discrepancy in the verification date. Even if these procedural defects were overlooked, the Board would have denied the petition on its merits, adopting the WCJ's reasoning. The underlying issues involved a special employee finding, joint and several liability, and the dismissal of CIGA.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JISTINA DORSEY vs. ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICE, UNITED WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION, BROADSPIRE VAN NUYS, Trans Pacific Insurance Company, CIGA (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox