Home/Case Law/JIMMY MADRIL vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JIMMY MADRIL vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

Filed: May 15, 2012
Riverside
ADJ6603270, ADJ6500326

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying his workers' compensation claim for various injuries, including sexual dysfunction, internal problems, and orthopedic issues, sustained from January 2003 to December 2008. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied his petition, finding it was unsigned and unverified. The Board also determined that the applicant failed to follow proper procedures for seeking medical treatment within the employer's established Medical Provider Network (MPN). Consequently, the employer was not liable for any self-procured unauthorized treatment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying his workers' compensation claim for various injuries, including sexual dysfunction, internal problems, and orthopedic issues, sustained from January 2003 to December 2008. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied his petition, finding it was unsigned and unverified. The Board also determined that the applicant failed to follow proper procedures for seeking medical treatment within the employer's established Medical Provider Network (MPN). Consequently, the employer was not liable for any self-procured unauthorized treatment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JIMMY MADRIL vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE (2012) – Riverside | CompFox