Home/Case Law/JIM WESTON vs. SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, INNOVATIVE CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JIM WESTON vs. SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, INNOVATIVE CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, INC.

Filed: Apr 24, 2008
San Francisco
WCK 0069591

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, a firefighter trainee, sought reconsideration of the denial of his discrimination claim under Labor Code section 132a. The Board upheld the WCJ's finding that the employer did not violate section 132a, as the applicant's termination was due to performance issues and not his industrial knee injury. The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination by showing he was singled out for disadvantageous treatment due to his injury, as required by the Lauher decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, a firefighter trainee, sought reconsideration of the denial of his discrimination claim under Labor Code section 132a. The Board upheld the WCJ's finding that the employer did not violate section 132a, as the applicant's termination was due to performance issues and not his industrial knee injury. The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination by showing he was singled out for disadvantageous treatment due to his injury, as required by the Lauher decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JIM WESTON vs. SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, INNOVATIVE CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, INC. (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox