CompFox AI Summary
This case denied a petition for reconsideration regarding a lien claim deadline. The lien claimant argued that the 18-month filing deadline under Labor Code § 4903.5(a) should not apply to continuous services that straddled the July 1, 2013 amendment date. The Board found the reasoning in Kindelberger persuasive, holding that for continuous treatment, the last date of service triggers the statute of limitations. The Board also affirmed it lacks jurisdiction to rule on statutory constitutionality.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case denied a petition for reconsideration regarding a lien claim deadline. The lien claimant argued that the 18-month filing deadline under Labor Code § 4903.5(a) should not apply to continuous services that straddled the July 1, 2013 amendment date. The Board found the reasoning in Kindelberger persuasive, holding that for continuous treatment, the last date of service triggers the statute of limitations. The Board also affirmed it lacks jurisdiction to rule on statutory constitutionality.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.