Home/Case Law/JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRemoval

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: May 17, 2018
Bakersfield
ADJ6746279, ADJ1951492

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted SCIF's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order for arbitration. The WCAB determined that Labor Code Section 5500.5, which mandates arbitration for cumulative injuries or occupational diseases, did not apply as the applicant sustained only specific injuries. Therefore, the WCAB found the WCJ exceeded their authority by ordering arbitration, and the matter is returned for further proceedings consistent with the WCAB's decision that the Appeals Board has jurisdiction over contribution disputes.

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted SCIF's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order for arbitration. The WCAB determined that Labor Code Section 5500.5, which mandates arbitration for cumulative injuries or occupational diseases, did not apply as the applicant sustained only specific injuries. Therefore, the WCAB found the WCJ exceeded their authority by ordering arbitration, and the matter is returned for further proceedings consistent with the WCAB's decision that the Appeals Board has jurisdiction over contribution disputes.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Bakersfield. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Bakersfield. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

JERRY HUCKABY vs. PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, Administered by Sedgwick CMS, FORD'S AUTO WRECKING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Bakersfield. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.