Home/Case Law/JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK

Filed: Sep 04, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ7825337, ADJ7825332

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Jennifer Melville's appeal of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision regarding her industrial injuries with Xerox Corporation. The applicant sought compensation for neck, lumbar spine, and headache injuries, but her claims for shoulder, upper extremity, knee, thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), internal, and sleep disorders were disputed. While the WCJ found 31% permanent disability for neck, spine, and headaches, the applicant appealed issues including a 15% permanent disability increase, a job displacement voucher, and the denial of TOS compensation. The WCAB deferred the decision on the 15% increase due to insufficient evidence and affirmed the WCJ's findings on other issues, with one commissioner dissenting on the TOS causation.

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Jennifer Melville's appeal of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision regarding her industrial injuries with Xerox Corporation. The applicant sought compensation for neck, lumbar spine, and headache injuries, but her claims for shoulder, upper extremity, knee, thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), internal, and sleep disorders were disputed. While the WCJ found 31% permanent disability for neck, spine, and headaches, the applicant appealed issues including a 15% permanent disability increase, a job displacement voucher, and the denial of TOS compensation. The WCAB deferred the decision on the 15% increase due to insufficient evidence and affirmed the WCJ's findings on other issues, with one commissioner dissenting on the TOS causation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK Case Analysis

JENNIFER MELVILLE vs. XEROX CORPORATION, JEFFREY S. SCHWARTZ, SPECIALTY RISK is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.