Home/Case Law/JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Aug 06, 2019
Oakland
ADJ9318348

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant claiming injury AOE/COE to multiple body parts, including the pituitary gland and cognitive loss, resulting in headaches. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the original Findings, Award, and Orders (FA&O) due to deficiencies in the medical evidence regarding permanent disability. The WCAB found Dr. Anderson's impairment ratings lacked substantial evidence and ordered further development of the record, including potential re-evaluation by Dr. Anderson and specialized opinions from ophthalmology and neuropsychology. The Board also upheld the prior finding of injury AOE/COE to the psyche, denying defendant's request to withdraw from that stipulation.

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant claiming injury AOE/COE to multiple body parts, including the pituitary gland and cognitive loss, resulting in headaches. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the original Findings, Award, and Orders (FA&O) due to deficiencies in the medical evidence regarding permanent disability. The WCAB found Dr. Anderson's impairment ratings lacked substantial evidence and ordered further development of the record, including potential re-evaluation by Dr. Anderson and specialized opinions from ophthalmology and neuropsychology. The Board also upheld the prior finding of injury AOE/COE to the psyche, denying defendant's request to withdraw from that stipulation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES workers compensation case in Oakland. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES case law summary from Oakland. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES Case Analysis

JENNIFER MCMULLEN vs. SPORTSMARK, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oakland. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.