Home/Case Law/JEFF RUSHING vs. HOBBIE CHEVROLET CADILLAC, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY by GAB ROBINS, NA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SENTRY INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JEFF RUSHING vs. HOBBIE CHEVROLET CADILLAC, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY by GAB ROBINS, NA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SENTRY INSURANCE

Filed: Mar 11, 2008
San Francisco
RDG 0108689, RDG 0108864

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves appeals from a workers' compensation award for spine and lower extremity injuries. The prior award granted 55% permanent disability jointly against two insurers, apportioned by injury date. The Appeals Board rescinded the award, finding the WCJ erred by issuing a joint award after legislative changes requiring apportionment based on causation. The matter is returned to the WCJ for a new decision applying current legal standards for apportionment and joint awards.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves appeals from a workers' compensation award for spine and lower extremity injuries. The prior award granted 55% permanent disability jointly against two insurers, apportioned by injury date. The Appeals Board rescinded the award, finding the WCJ erred by issuing a joint award after legislative changes requiring apportionment based on causation. The matter is returned to the WCJ for a new decision applying current legal standards for apportionment and joint awards.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JEFF RUSHING vs. HOBBIE CHEVROLET CADILLAC, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY by GAB ROBINS, NA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SENTRY INSURANCE (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox