CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversing the original finding of 36% permanent disability. The Board found the WCJ erred by not giving sufficient weight to the PQME's opinion, which suggested a higher impairment rating for the applicant's thumb injury based on factors not explicitly covered by the AMA Guides. Consequently, the applicant's permanent disability was increased to 51%, and their attorney's fee was adjusted accordingly. The decision highlights the principle that medical opinions may deviate from strict AMA Guides application when clinical judgment and comparable impairments are warranted.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversing the original finding of 36% permanent disability. The Board found the WCJ erred by not giving sufficient weight to the PQME's opinion, which suggested a higher impairment rating for the applicant's thumb injury based on factors not explicitly covered by the AMA Guides. Consequently, the applicant's permanent disability was increased to 51%, and their attorney's fee was adjusted accordingly. The decision highlights the principle that medical opinions may deviate from strict AMA Guides application when clinical judgment and comparable impairments are warranted.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.