CompFox AI Summary
This case affirms a prior award finding applicant's permanent disability at 18% and rated under the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS). The Board rejected applicant's challenge to the PDRS's validity, deeming the issue waived as it wasn't raised at trial. Furthermore, the Board affirmed that it cannot rule on a statute's constitutionality without an appellate court ruling, and applicant provided no evidence to rebut the PDRS's presumptive validity.
JAVIER PACHECO vs. NORM QUADROS/CORDELL DAVID PLASTERING and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case affirms a prior award finding applicant's permanent disability at 18% and rated under the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS). The Board rejected applicant's challenge to the PDRS's validity, deeming the issue waived as it wasn't raised at trial. Furthermore, the Board affirmed that it cannot rule on a statute's constitutionality without an appellate court ruling, and applicant provided no evidence to rebut the PDRS's presumptive validity.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.