Home/Case Law/JASON SUMMERS vs. SANTA CLARA COUNTY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JASON SUMMERS vs. SANTA CLARA COUNTY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Apr 01, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ9567245

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a petition for reconsideration by Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority regarding a psychological injury claim sustained by applicant Jason Summers. The petitioner argued the applicant was the initial physical aggressor, barring his claim under Labor Code section 3600(a)(7). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's finding that the petitioner failed to meet its burden of proof. The WCJ's credibility determination, favoring a neutral witness over conflicting applicant and co-worker testimony, was central to this decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a petition for reconsideration by Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority regarding a psychological injury claim sustained by applicant Jason Summers. The petitioner argued the applicant was the initial physical aggressor, barring his claim under Labor Code section 3600(a)(7). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's finding that the petitioner failed to meet its burden of proof. The WCJ's credibility determination, favoring a neutral witness over conflicting applicant and co-worker testimony, was central to this decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JASON SUMMERS vs. SANTA CLARA COUNTY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT (2016) – Van Nuys | CompFox