Home/Case Law/JASON MANTOOTH vs. SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, PEGASUS RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JASON MANTOOTH vs. SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, PEGASUS RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jan 03, 2008
San Francisco
FRE 0208997

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration in Mantooth v. Save Mart Supermarkets. The Board affirmed that a defendant is liable for an applicant's attorney fees if they pay out all indemnity without withholding funds for a fee. This liability exists because an attorney's appearance in a case provides sufficient notice that a fee will be claimed against any indemnity due.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration in Mantooth v. Save Mart Supermarkets. The Board affirmed that a defendant is liable for an applicant's attorney fees if they pay out all indemnity without withholding funds for a fee. This liability exists because an attorney's appearance in a case provides sufficient notice that a fee will be claimed against any indemnity due.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JASON MANTOOTH vs. SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, PEGASUS RISK MANAGEMENT (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox