Home/Case Law/JAMES PETERS vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, SEDGWICK WALLNUT CREEK
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAMES PETERS vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, SEDGWICK WALLNUT CREEK

Filed: Jun 30, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ3445498 (SFO 0440451) ADJ4010324 (SFO 0496717)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Federal Express and Sedgwick Walnut Creek after an award was made to James Peters for new and further permanent disability. The Appeals Board denied the reconsideration, adopting the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) report. The ALJ found sufficient medical evidence of new and further permanent disability based on Agreed Medical Evaluator Dr. Feinberg's reports, leading to an adjusted award of 54% permanent disability. The Board also noted that the defendant's petition contained sanctionable misrepresentations and mis-citations regarding legal precedent.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Federal Express and Sedgwick Walnut Creek after an award was made to James Peters for new and further permanent disability. The Appeals Board denied the reconsideration, adopting the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) report. The ALJ found sufficient medical evidence of new and further permanent disability based on Agreed Medical Evaluator Dr. Feinberg's reports, leading to an adjusted award of 54% permanent disability. The Board also noted that the defendant's petition contained sanctionable misrepresentations and mis-citations regarding legal precedent.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JAMES PETERS vs. FEDERAL EXPRESS, SEDGWICK WALLNUT CREEK (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox