Home/Case Law/JAMES PATTON vs. ABSOLUTE SECURITY INCORPORATED, KEIKO ARROYO, CARMEL VALLEY VILLAGE ONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STATE FARM INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAMES PATTON vs. ABSOLUTE SECURITY INCORPORATED, KEIKO ARROYO, CARMEL VALLEY VILLAGE ONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STATE FARM INSURANCE

Filed: Jun 21, 2019
San Diego
ADJ9722566

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves James Patton's workers' compensation claim against Absolute Security Incorporated, which was uninsured. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. While affirming the original decision, the Board amended the findings to include injury to the left knee and cervical spine, but excluded the left elbow. The issue of psychiatric injury remains deferred.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves James Patton's workers' compensation claim against Absolute Security Incorporated, which was uninsured. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. While affirming the original decision, the Board amended the findings to include injury to the left knee and cervical spine, but excluded the left elbow. The issue of psychiatric injury remains deferred.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JAMES PATTON vs. ABSOLUTE SECURITY INCORPORATED, KEIKO ARROYO, CARMEL VALLEY VILLAGE ONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STATE FARM INSURANCE (2019) – San Diego | CompFox