CompFox AI Summary
This case involves James Patton's workers' compensation claim against Absolute Security Incorporated, which was uninsured. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. While affirming the original decision, the Board amended the findings to include injury to the left knee and cervical spine, but excluded the left elbow. The issue of psychiatric injury remains deferred.
JAMES PATTON vs. ABSOLUTE SECURITY INCORPORATED, KEIKO ARROYO, CARMEL VALLEY VILLAGE ONE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STATE FARM INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves James Patton's workers' compensation claim against Absolute Security Incorporated, which was uninsured. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision. While affirming the original decision, the Board amended the findings to include injury to the left knee and cervical spine, but excluded the left elbow. The issue of psychiatric injury remains deferred.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.