Home/Case Law/James Mc Duffie vs. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Constitution State Service Company
En Banc DecisionEn Banc

James Mc Duffie vs. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Constitution State Service Company

Filed: Feb 25, 2002
MISSING
MON 254928

CompFox AI Summary

The Board held that when a medical record requires further development after a case has been submitted, the preferred procedure is to first seek supplemental opinions from the physicians who have already reported in the case, rather than immediately appointing a new medical evaluator.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Board held that when a medical record requires further development after a case has been submitted, the preferred procedure is to first seek supplemental opinions from the physicians who have already reported in the case, rather than immediately appointing a new medical evaluator.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

James Mc Duffie vs. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Constitution State Service Company (2002) – MISSING | CompFox