CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns an applicant awarded medical treatment for admitted industrial cardiovascular and psyche injuries. The defendant sought reconsideration, primarily challenging the need for "back up services" and the specific payment terms. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify that "back up services" are an entitlement for the applicant, not a direct obligation to a specific individual. The award was amended to stipulate two hours of "back up services" daily at $8 per hour, with providers to bill the defendant according to standard procedures, thus addressing concerns about potential employment relationships.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns an applicant awarded medical treatment for admitted industrial cardiovascular and psyche injuries. The defendant sought reconsideration, primarily challenging the need for "back up services" and the specific payment terms. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify that "back up services" are an entitlement for the applicant, not a direct obligation to a specific individual. The award was amended to stipulate two hours of "back up services" daily at $8 per hour, with providers to bill the defendant according to standard procedures, thus addressing concerns about potential employment relationships.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.