Home/Case Law/JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.
Regular Decision

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Dec 23, 2013
ADJ2730977 (VNO 0472204)

CompFox AI Summary

In Followay v. Accor North America, Inc., the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's reasoning that the petition was filed 26 days after service by mail of the prior order. California law requires petitions for reconsideration to be filed (received by) the Board within 25 days, not merely mailed. Proof of mailing within the deadline is insufficient if the petition is not received within that jurisdictional timeframe.

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Followay v. Accor North America, Inc., the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's reasoning that the petition was filed 26 days after service by mail of the prior order. California law requires petitions for reconsideration to be filed (received by) the Board within 25 days, not merely mailed. Proof of mailing within the deadline is insufficient if the petition is not received within that jurisdictional timeframe.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. Case Analysis

JAMES FOLLOWAY vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., doing business as MOTEL 6, UNITED STATES FIRE & GUARANTEE INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.