Home/Case Law/JAMES BISHOP vs. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR COMPANY, ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

JAMES BISHOP vs. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR COMPANY, ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Apr 22, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ1768236 (VNO 0353137) ADJ4711027 (VNO 0353138)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an applicant seeking workers' compensation benefits for industrial injuries sustained from 1970 to 1996. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the WCJ's Supplemental Findings and Award. While affirming the award for a sleep disorder evaluation, internal medical evaluations, a raised toilet seat, grab bars, and a Weight Watchers program, the Board reversed the WCJ's decision regarding housekeeping, gardening, and pool services, finding them not to be medical treatment. The issues of penalties for unreasonable delay and attorney fees were deferred for further proceedings at the trial level due to a lack of detailed analysis by the WCJ.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an applicant seeking workers' compensation benefits for industrial injuries sustained from 1970 to 1996. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the WCJ's Supplemental Findings and Award. While affirming the award for a sleep disorder evaluation, internal medical evaluations, a raised toilet seat, grab bars, and a Weight Watchers program, the Board reversed the WCJ's decision regarding housekeeping, gardening, and pool services, finding them not to be medical treatment. The issues of penalties for unreasonable delay and attorney fees were deferred for further proceedings at the trial level due to a lack of detailed analysis by the WCJ.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.