Home/Case Law/JAMAL CLARK vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by CMS, NFL EUROPE, TIG INSURANCE, Administered by REM
Regular Decision

JAMAL CLARK vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by CMS, NFL EUROPE, TIG INSURANCE, Administered by REM

Filed: Oct 09, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ7106696

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, Jamal Clark v. Seattle Seahawks, involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a July 16, 2012, award. The Board has granted this petition to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues presented. The Board believes this is necessary to thoroughly understand the record and render a just decision. Pending the Decision After Reconsideration, all filings must be submitted in writing directly to the Commissioners' office in San Francisco, not to district offices or through e-filing.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, Jamal Clark v. Seattle Seahawks, involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a July 16, 2012, award. The Board has granted this petition to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues presented. The Board believes this is necessary to thoroughly understand the record and render a just decision. Pending the Decision After Reconsideration, all filings must be submitted in writing directly to the Commissioners' office in San Francisco, not to district offices or through e-filing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JAMAL CLARK vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by CMS, NFL EUROPE, TIG INSURANCE, Administered by REM (2012) – Van Nuys | CompFox