CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant, Jam Kwong, who sought workers' compensation benefits. The defense petitioned for reconsideration, arguing the administrative law judge (WCJ) erred in classifying Kwong's occupation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report. The WCJ found that while Kwong's core duties involved cooking, his role also integrally included supervising inmates and maintaining safety, warranting the chosen occupational group. The Board gave significant weight to the WCJ's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to overturn it.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant, Jam Kwong, who sought workers' compensation benefits. The defense petitioned for reconsideration, arguing the administrative law judge (WCJ) erred in classifying Kwong's occupation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report. The WCJ found that while Kwong's core duties involved cooking, his role also integrally included supervising inmates and maintaining safety, warranting the chosen occupational group. The Board gave significant weight to the WCJ's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to overturn it.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.