CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was based on allegations of mutual mistake of fact that lacked supporting evidence. While the petition was timely filed, the Board found insufficient evidence to grant relief from the Stipulations with Request for Award. The Board recommended the applicant's petition be treated as a petition to set aside, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present proof. Therefore, the Board dismissed the reconsideration petition as premature.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was based on allegations of mutual mistake of fact that lacked supporting evidence. While the petition was timely filed, the Board found insufficient evidence to grant relief from the Stipulations with Request for Award. The Board recommended the applicant's petition be treated as a petition to set aside, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present proof. Therefore, the Board dismissed the reconsideration petition as premature.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.