CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in Findler v. Walmart. The WCAB adopted the findings of the WCJ, who found that the lien claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence of the reasonable value of services rendered. This was because the applicable fee schedule did not control for services provided before its effective date. Therefore, the lien claimant was required to present evidence of reasonable value, which they did not adequately do.
JACQUELINE FINDLER vs. WALMART, AVIZENT, YORK INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in Findler v. Walmart. The WCAB adopted the findings of the WCJ, who found that the lien claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence of the reasonable value of services rendered. This was because the applicable fee schedule did not control for services provided before its effective date. Therefore, the lien claimant was required to present evidence of reasonable value, which they did not adequately do.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.