CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought removal of an order appointing a new medical evaluator, arguing the existing record was sufficient and the judge lacked objectivity. The Board denied removal, finding the judge's prior order to further develop the record was justified due to inconsistent medical opinions. The applicant also alleged judicial bias, but the Board found no evidence to warrant disqualification of the judge. Therefore, the petition for removal and request for disqualification were denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought removal of an order appointing a new medical evaluator, arguing the existing record was sufficient and the judge lacked objectivity. The Board denied removal, finding the judge's prior order to further develop the record was justified due to inconsistent medical opinions. The applicant also alleged judicial bias, but the Board found no evidence to warrant disqualification of the judge. Therefore, the petition for removal and request for disqualification were denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.