Home/Case Law/JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Nov 28, 2012
ADJ2155279 (RIV 0040729)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) amended a previous award to defer the issue of attorney fees for enforcing an award of Labor Code section 5710 fees. The WCAB affirmed the remainder of the award, including a $100 penalty for unreasonable delay in authorizing medical treatment, finding the 100-day delay in authorizing treatment with the applicant's chosen physician was unreasonable. The Board also affirmed the award of attorney fees under Labor Code section 5814.5 for enforcing the medical treatment award. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the amount of section 5814.5 fees, with a dissenting opinion arguing for further proceedings on the unreasonable delay issue due to insufficient evidence.

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) amended a previous award to defer the issue of attorney fees for enforcing an award of Labor Code section 5710 fees. The WCAB affirmed the remainder of the award, including a $100 penalty for unreasonable delay in authorizing medical treatment, finding the 100-day delay in authorizing treatment with the applicant's chosen physician was unreasonable. The Board also affirmed the award of attorney fees under Labor Code section 5814.5 for enforcing the medical treatment award. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the amount of section 5814.5 fees, with a dissenting opinion arguing for further proceedings on the unreasonable delay issue due to insufficient evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

JACK RAMSEY vs. CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Sedgwick CMS, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.