Home/Case Law/JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO)
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO)

Filed: Jul 16, 2007
San Francisco
SFO 0492500

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns CIGA's petition for reconsideration of a decision awarding the applicant a self-imposed 10% penalty on death benefits and an additional penalty for unreasonable refusal to pay. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, holding that death benefits paid in installments are subject to Labor Code section 4650(d) because they are paid in the same manner and amounts as temporary disability indemnity. The Board remanded the case to the trial level for further proceedings, including consideration of the applicant's separate petition for penalties.

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO) is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns CIGA's petition for reconsideration of a decision awarding the applicant a self-imposed 10% penalty on death benefits and an additional penalty for unreasonable refusal to pay. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, holding that death benefits paid in installments are subject to Labor Code section 4650(d) because they are paid in the same manner and amounts as temporary disability indemnity. The Board remanded the case to the trial level for further proceedings, including consideration of the applicant's separate petition for penalties.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO) workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO) case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO) Case Analysis

JACK BERMAN (Dec.), CAROL KINGSLEY (Wid.) vs. BRONSON, BRONSON & McKINNON, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP/CIGA for FREMONT (SAN DIEGO) is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.