Home/Case Law/JACINTO BECERRA vs. JOHN LITZO dba LAKE CHAPALA
Regular Decisionnull

JACINTO BECERRA vs. JOHN LITZO dba LAKE CHAPALA

Filed: Feb 24, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ277813 (SAC 0359011)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, overturning a WCJ's order that reopened discovery for an absent, potentially uninsured employer. The Board found that continuing discovery beyond the Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) violated Labor Code section 5502(e)(3) absent good cause. The hearing scheduled for March 7, 2011, was redesignated as an MSC, and the case was returned to the trial level. If the employer fails to appear at this new MSC, discovery will close, and any subsequent evidence offered will be inadmissible without a showing of due diligence.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, overturning a WCJ's order that reopened discovery for an absent, potentially uninsured employer. The Board found that continuing discovery beyond the Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) violated Labor Code section 5502(e)(3) absent good cause. The hearing scheduled for March 7, 2011, was redesignated as an MSC, and the case was returned to the trial level. If the employer fails to appear at this new MSC, discovery will close, and any subsequent evidence offered will be inadmissible without a showing of due diligence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JACINTO BECERRA vs. JOHN LITZO dba LAKE CHAPALA (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox