Home/Case Law/IZABEL GEORGE vs. ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

IZABEL GEORGE vs. ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 10, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ1821139

CompFox AI Summary

In Izabel George v. Associated Third Party Administrators, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be inadequate. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning, finding no such showing was made by the petitioner. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Izabel George v. Associated Third Party Administrators, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy, granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be inadequate. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's reasoning, finding no such showing was made by the petitioner. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

IZABEL GEORGE vs. ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2017) – San Francisco | CompFox