Home/Case Law/IVIN DREW vs. NESTLE USA, INC.
Regular DecisionRemoval

IVIN DREW vs. NESTLE USA, INC.

Filed: Jan 23, 2014
Fresno
ADJ8394536

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant, Nestle USA, Inc., petitioned for removal, challenging a WCJ's order for a second QME appointment due to a late supplemental report. The Appeals Board granted the petition because the defendant's crucial exhibits and medical reports were not scanned into the electronic system, preventing a merits-based decision. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's prior order and returned the case to the trial level to establish a sufficient record. This action ensures the parties can properly litigate the dispute over the QME appointment rules.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant, Nestle USA, Inc., petitioned for removal, challenging a WCJ's order for a second QME appointment due to a late supplemental report. The Appeals Board granted the petition because the defendant's crucial exhibits and medical reports were not scanned into the electronic system, preventing a merits-based decision. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's prior order and returned the case to the trial level to establish a sufficient record. This action ensures the parties can properly litigate the dispute over the QME appointment rules.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.