Home/Case Law/IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filed: Aug 09, 2016
Anaheim
ADJ9233152

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant's attorneys sought reconsideration of an order awarding them $10,000.00 for a serious and willful misconduct claim, arguing the Compromise and Release (C&R) stipulated a $20,000.00 fee. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the WCJ correctly determined the requested fee exceeded guidelines and that the attorneys failed to comply with notice requirements for seeking increased fees. The WCJ had discretion to award a reasonable fee considering multiple factors, and here, the attorneys did not meet the procedural mandates for a higher award. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning in denying the petition.

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant's attorneys sought reconsideration of an order awarding them $10,000.00 for a serious and willful misconduct claim, arguing the Compromise and Release (C&R) stipulated a $20,000.00 fee. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the WCJ correctly determined the requested fee exceeded guidelines and that the attorneys failed to comply with notice requirements for seeking increased fees. The WCJ had discretion to award a reasonable fee considering multiple factors, and here, the attorneys did not meet the procedural mandates for a higher award. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning in denying the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA Case Analysis

IRMA BARRERA vs. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORPORATION, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.