Home/Case Law/in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

David Allen Neuenschwander, Jr. appealed the trial court's order terminating his parental rights to his three children, S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N. The children were initially removed from their mother's custody due to neglectful supervision and physical neglect. Neuenschwander challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the termination findings, the findings related to his paternity for S.N. and S.M.N., and the constitutionality of Texas Family Code section 263.405(i). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence that the children were removed due to neglect and that termination was in their best interest. The court also rejected the constitutional challenge to section 263.405(i) and declined to review the paternity findings due to appellant's failure to preserve the complaint.

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

David Allen Neuenschwander, Jr. appealed the trial court's order terminating his parental rights to his three children, S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N. The children were initially removed from their mother's custody due to neglectful supervision and physical neglect. Neuenschwander challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the termination findings, the findings related to his paternity for S.N. and S.M.N., and the constitutionality of Texas Family Code section 263.405(i). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding sufficient evidence that the children were removed due to neglect and that termination was in their best interest. The court also rejected the constitutional challenge to section 263.405(i) and declined to review the paternity findings due to appellant's failure to preserve the complaint.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children Case Analysis

in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.