Home/Case Law/In re Sorkin
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

In re Sorkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Respondent Olga Sorkin, admitted to practice in New York in 1993, was charged in a multicount indictment, including restraint of trade, enterprise corruption, commercial bribery, and offering a false instrument for filing. These charges stemmed from her involvement with other attorneys in bribing hospital workers for medical records to identify potential personal injury lawsuit candidates, subsequently splitting earnings from insurance claims. In May 2005, Sorkin pleaded guilty in Supreme Court, New York County, to first-degree offering a false instrument for filing, a felony, and was sentenced to five years probation and ordered to pay $50,000 in restitution. Her firm, Olga Sorkin, P.C., also entered a guilty plea for the same charge. The Departmental Disciplinary Committee sought her disbarment based on this felony conviction, a request she did not oppose. Consequently, her name was stricken from the roll of attorneys in New York, effective nunc pro tunc to May 19, 2005.

In re Sorkin is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Respondent Olga Sorkin, admitted to practice in New York in 1993, was charged in a multicount indictment, including restraint of trade, enterprise corruption, commercial bribery, and offering a false instrument for filing. These charges stemmed from her involvement with other attorneys in bribing hospital workers for medical records to identify potential personal injury lawsuit candidates, subsequently splitting earnings from insurance claims. In May 2005, Sorkin pleaded guilty in Supreme Court, New York County, to first-degree offering a false instrument for filing, a felony, and was sentenced to five years probation and ordered to pay $50,000 in restitution. Her firm, Olga Sorkin, P.C., also entered a guilty plea for the same charge. The Departmental Disciplinary Committee sought her disbarment based on this felony conviction, a request she did not oppose. Consequently, her name was stricken from the roll of attorneys in New York, effective nunc pro tunc to May 19, 2005.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

In re Sorkin workers compensation case in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

In re Sorkin case law summary from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

In re Sorkin Case Analysis

In re Sorkin is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.